← Back to Calculator

Aircraft Bonus Depreciation & the 50% Business Use Test

Research notes — not tax advice. Consult your CPA/tax attorney.

Bottom Line Up Front

1. The 50% Qualified Business Use Test

Under IRC Section 280F, aircraft are classified as "listed property." To claim bonus depreciation or accelerated MACRS depreciation, the aircraft must be used more than 50% for "qualified business use" during the tax year.

Treas. Reg. § 1.280F-6(d)(2): "The Section 280F test is based solely on business use. Investment use does not count."

What counts as "qualified business use"

What does NOT count toward the 50%

The twist: investment use still gets depreciation

If the 50% business use threshold is met, then both business and investment use can be included in calculating the deductible percentage of depreciation. So investment use matters for the size of the deduction — it just can't help you clear the 50% hurdle.

Example: 55% trade/business use + 20% investment use + 25% personal = 75% of depreciation is deductible (55% + 20%). The 50% test passes because business use alone is 55%.

2. W-2 Employee vs. LLC Owner vs. Private Investor

The 50% test is about the nature of the activity, not your employment classification. The critical question is: are you engaged in a trade or business (Section 162) or an investment activity (Section 212)?

Taxpayer Type Likely Qualifies? Key Consideration
W-2 executive flying for employer's business Yes Employer's trade or business clearly established
Self-employed / sole proprietor Yes Must have bona fide Section 162 trade or business
LLC member-manager of operating business Yes Flights must be for the LLC's trade or business
S-corp shareholder-employee Yes S-corp must have active trade or business
Real estate developer / active manager Likely yes Must meet "continuity and regularity" test; more properties + active management = stronger
Passive investor / portfolio manager Generally no Managing investments is Section 212, not 162. Exception: family office structured as trade or business (see Lender Management)
Board member of companies Depends Serving as director is generally Section 162 if compensated and regular; attending as a passive shareholder is not

3. Section 162 (Trade or Business) vs. Section 212 (Investment)

This is the critical distinction. The IRS and courts use a facts-and-circumstances test to determine whether an activity rises to the level of a "trade or business."

Section 162 — Trade or Business

Per Commissioner v. Groetzinger (1987), the taxpayer must be involved in the activity with:

Activities that typically qualify under 162

Activities that typically fall under 212 (investment — does NOT count)

Higgins v. Commissioner, 312 U.S. 212 (1941): The Supreme Court held that merely managing one's own investments — even full-time, with an office and staff — is generally not a trade or business under Section 162. This remains the controlling precedent. Exception: if you are a dealer (e.g., real estate dealer buying/selling as inventory) or operate a business managing other people's money for fees, that can qualify.
The key question for you: When you fly somewhere on the plane, is the primary purpose of the trip an activity that would generate a Section 162 deduction? If you're flying to inspect a real estate development you actively manage, oversee a business you operate, or meet clients of your consulting practice — that's 162. If you're flying to meet your wealth advisor or check on a passive investment — that's 212.

4. Entity Structuring Strategies

Aircraft in a separate LLC

A common structure: aircraft owned by an LLC, which leases it to your operating business(es). This can work but has traps:

The related-party lease trap

Per TAM 200945037 (confirmed in DiDonato v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2013-11): when an aircraft is leased between related parties, the IRS takes the position that all flights by a 5% owner under that lease are treated as non-qualified use — even if genuinely for business — unless the 25% independent-use exception is met. The NBAA calls this a "trap for the unwary."

Practical approach for your situation

With 50% ownership and Part 135 charter availability:

5. Part 135 Charter & the "For Hire" Exclusion

Section 280F(d)(4)(C) provides that aircraft are not treated as listed property if "substantially all of the use" is in a trade or business of transporting persons or property for compensation. If this exclusion applies, the 50% test doesn't apply at all.

When does the exclusion apply?

Mixed use (your situation)

If you're using the plane ~125 hours personally and chartering ~100 hours out of 400 total, the for-hire exclusion won't apply (charter is only 25% of use). But those charter hours do count as qualified business use toward the 50% test.

MACRS recovery period note

Part 135 use changes the depreciation schedule: 7-year MACRS (vs. 5-year for Part 91 only) or 12-year ADS (vs. 6-year). If the aircraft has mixed Part 91/135 use, the recovery period of the predominant use applies. With 100% bonus depreciation under OBBBA, the recovery period matters less since you're deducting 100% in Year 1 anyway.

6. Current Bonus Depreciation Law (as of 2026)

OBBBA — signed July 4, 2025

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act permanently restored 100% bonus depreciation for qualified property, including aircraft, acquired and placed in service after January 19, 2025.

Acquisition DateBonus RateAuthority
Before Jan 1, 2023100%TCJA
202380%TCJA phaseout
202460%TCJA phaseout
Jan 1 – Jan 19, 202540%TCJA phaseout
After Jan 19, 2025100%OBBBA (permanent)
For your purchase: If you acquire and place in service in 2026, you get 100% bonus depreciation on your $5M share (assuming the 50% business use test is met). That's a $5M deduction in Year 1 — worth $1.85M at a 37% marginal rate.

Transitional election

OBBBA allows an election to take only 40% (or 60% for aircraft with longer production periods) instead of 100%. This could be useful if you want to spread the deduction across multiple years or if taking $5M in Year 1 creates AMT or other issues.

Section 179 expansion

OBBBA also raised the Section 179 limit to $2.5M (from $1M) with a $4M phaseout threshold. This provides an alternative expensing path if bonus depreciation isn't available.

7. What Happens If You Fail the 50% Test

In the year of acquisition

If business use drops below 50% in a later year

Risk factor: With $5M in Year 1 bonus depreciation, recapture in a later year could mean recognizing a very large income inclusion. Maintaining >50% business use every year during the recovery period is critical.

8. Documentation & IRS Scrutiny

The IRS launched a dedicated compliance campaign for business aircraft in February 2024 (IR-2024-46), funded by the Inflation Reduction Act. They've released sample Information Document Requests (IDRs) showing what they'll ask for in audits.

What you must maintain

Contemporaneous = at the time of the flight. Section 274(d) requires "adequate records or sufficient evidence corroborating the taxpayer's own statement." Reconstructing records after the fact is a losing position in Tax Court.

9. Charitable / Nonprofit Use

Flights for charitable purposes are 100% deductible as a charitable contribution (not a business expense). This includes:

However, charitable use is not "qualified business use" for the 280F test — it doesn't help you clear the 50% threshold. It's a separate deduction under Section 170, subject to charitable contribution limits (generally 60% of AGI for cash, 30% for capital gain property).

10. Applying This to Your Situation

The core question: do you have sufficient Section 162 trade or business activity to clear the 50% test?

Paths to meeting the 50% test

SourceHrs (est)% of 200 owner hrsQualifies?
Flights for active operating businesses you manage ? ? Yes — Section 162
Active real estate management / development ? ? Likely — if continuous & regular
Compensated board service ? ? Depends on regularity
Part 135 charter (your share of hours) ~50 25% Yes — trade or business
Passive investment management ? ? No — Section 212
Personal / vacation ? ? No
If you have active businesses: Between your trade/business flights and the charter hours allocated to your ownership share, reaching 50%+ should be feasible. The charter hours alone might get you to 25%, and you'd need your business flights to make up the rest.

If you're primarily a passive investor: This is the risk area. Flying to check on passive investments, meet wealth advisors, or attend shareholder meetings is Section 212 and won't count. You'd need to restructure activities or rely more heavily on charter hours. A family office structure providing management services (per Lender Management) could help reclassify some activity as Section 162.

Key Case Law & IRS Guidance

AuthorityRelevance
Higgins v. Commissioner, 312 U.S. 212 (1941)Managing own investments is not a trade or business
Commissioner v. Groetzinger, 480 U.S. 23 (1987)Trade or business requires continuity, regularity, profit motive
TAM 200945037 (2009)Related-party lease flights by 5% owners = non-qualified use
DiDonato v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2013-11Followed TAM 200945037 on related-party lease restrictions
Noyce v. Commissioner, 97 T.C. 670 (1991)Mixed charter/business use allocation methodology
Bruns v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2009-168Inadequate documentation defeats deductions
Lender Management, LLC v. CommissionerFamily office providing management services may qualify as Section 162
CCA 201228036 (2012)Primary use test for Part 91 vs. Part 135 recovery period
IRS Notice 2026-11Interim guidance on OBBBA bonus depreciation transition rules
IR-2024-46IRS announces business aircraft audit compliance campaign

Sources